Ray Ban New Wayfarer Braun Beige

SubscriptionsGo to the Subscriptions Centre to manage your:My ProfileIn keeping with our most recent blog post regarding how some politicians seem like deer in the headlights of new technology comes another doozy. This time it’s one of our own, Senator Marjory LeBreton, who is caught saying something most in tech land would deem rather foolish. The transcript, courtesy of Macleans, is as follows:Hon.

I was convinced it was bath salts, or some crazy dissociative but turns out he was a recovering junkie that had relapsed earlier. Still doesn’t make sense to me, but that’s the story. Neighbor had taken him in, gave him a job and food but under the agreement he would stay clean.

No amount of Plastic Surgery to include your eye lifts are making you look younger . It makes u look PLASTIC. I see why Ashton lis looking elsewhere. BBC Review Entertaining, sunny side up fare, despite its obvious debt to the likes of J Dilla.Mike Diver 2010While wholly generic, to the position of near pastiche at times, the debut long player from Toro Y Moi aka South Carolina Chaz Bundick is nevertheless engrossing and entertaining, lifting as it does from sources as exquisite as the squelch and fizz beatscapes of J Dilla and the blogosphere borne chillwave sounds of summer 2009. If the likes of Memory Tapes and Washed Out have been mainstays on your stereo since the sun slipped behind the choking cloud of continuing winter, Causers of This is a certainty to brighten your own horizons even if those outside retain their greyness.Unlike, say, Memory Tapes though, Bundick doesn burn straight for a memorable hook, the pop elements of Causers of This trickling slowly from a frame that shaped primarily upon forms usually spied and assimilated by artists operating in more dance savvy circles. Come the album midsection, echoes abound of not only Dilla (Fax Shadow, especially) but also more recent purveyors of glitched and grafted forward thinking hip hop: Flying Lotus stands proud as the primary parallel to be drawn.

It’s that he’s a regular poster in a sub which requires unfaltering loyalty to and the worship of one single politician to the point of absolute lunacy. The fact that the entire sub will switch stances on any one subject based on the most recent tweet by their god emperor idol and ban anyone who shows any signs of disagreement means that there is no point in debating them.EDIT: If I’m going to get into a debate with someone, I need to be able to assume that person is going to have a conversation in good faith and be a rational actor. Being a regular poster on The Donald automatically negates both of those points for the reasons listed above.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply